Yorick
Yorick
last online: 02/28, 23:53
Verified User (6 years, 6 months)
Long Term User
Shoutout0

im not sure what to think.

was a bit late on watching this " making a murderer" series.. i just couldnt believe it, innocent or guilty i just dont know what to believe. i kept going back n forth with the program.. guilty.. innocent.. guilty .. then innocent again.

had me goin that prosecution had a motive and only one motive. makes me wonder how many innocent people are in jail right now..

This open post was written |
Views: 104, Subscribers: 5 |
Leave a reply | Report Post

⇩ Zoom to bottom
Reciprocity (0)
Reciprocity
Since writing this post Yorick may have helped people, but has not within the last four (4) days.
Post Tags (5)
people, jail, guilty, innocent, motive
Replies (8)
Electric
BA1
last online: 01/25, 20:20
Verified User (6 years, 6 months)
Long Term User
Shoutout0
#
(13 minutes after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

In a court of law, the presumption of "innocence" does not exist....

The verdict at the end of anyone's trial will either be 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty.'

No court ever declares "innocence," at the end of the trial.

This means, the least you can be is "Not Guilty."

D
(6 hours after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

He's probably guilty. But he's not guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" if you define that as a doubt you have a reason for.

The county should have been entirely hands off, and removed the reason for doubt. As they did not, he should've walked. As we believe it's better to let a guilty person free rather than hold an innocent one, the fact he's probably guilty should not have trumped the reasonable doubt.

Dr. ralph club zps9ornptsl
(18 hours after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

I know I got a DUI and never drove intoxicated, well not that day anyways. I appeared very guilty though...

I was driving recklessly and when I got to where I was going I took a handful of pills and started drinking. What I didn't know was that someone had reported me, everyone has a camera and thinks they're a cop now. So the cops show up and I'm wasted out of my mind and they have a video of me driving like a crazed maniac. BOOM guilty as charged.

Electric
BA1
last online: 01/25, 20:20
Verified User (6 years, 6 months)
Long Term User
Shoutout0
#
(18 hours after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

DocteurRalph wrote:
I know I got a DUI and never drove intoxicated, well not that day anyways. I appeared very guilty though...

I was driving recklessly and when I got to where I was going I took a handful of pills and started drinking. What I didn't know was that someone had reported me, everyone has a camera and thinks they're a cop now. So the cops show up and I'm wasted out of my mind and they have a video of me driving like a crazed maniac. BOOM guilty as charged.

๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ๐Ÿ˜ฆ
Just, wow!

2vbsok9
(1 day after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

DocteurRalph wrote:
I know I got a DUI and never drove intoxicated, well not that day anyways. I appeared very guilty though...

I was driving recklessly and when I got to where I was going I took a handful of pills and started drinking. What I didn't know was that someone had reported me, everyone has a camera and thinks they're a cop now. So the cops show up and I'm wasted out of my mind and they have a video of me driving like a crazed maniac. BOOM guilty as charged.

Thatโ€™s why itโ€™s advised to not drink or take any controlled substances in a few hours after driving recklessly or being involved in accidents or other incidents as that might make things worse down the line.
If there is a good reason for the behavior, things might be explained and let go, but if one is riggedy wrecked.. well.. not so much.

Img 5499 photo full
(2 days after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

When I dunno what to think I tend to decide to not think and wait for my brain to reload and do it later. And then forget to go back to it ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ™ˆ

Yorick
(3 days after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

can anyone honestly say they paid any attention to it?.. i mean the timelines! , state expert screw-ups.. ugh so much BS and the constant State of Wisconsin rejections of appeals.. to bury their ****fuck-ups.

if you asked me .. all started after the lawsuit that never happened - for 32 million of wrongful conviction and 18 yrs imprisonment.

pls watch it and make use of your best judgement.

4be8c2d8 78e3 4f52 8977 21b6cc47a3ee
last online: 12/14, 0:56
Verified User (6 years, 6 months)
Long Term User
Shoutout0
#
(2 weeks after post)
Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Slash wrote:
In a court of law, the presumption of "innocence" does not exist....

The verdict at the end of anyone's trial will either be 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty.'

No court ever declares "innocence," at the end of the trial.

This means, the least you can be is "Not Guilty."

Absolutely false. There is a presumption of innocence. Please see following article to support my statement:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/instituteforjustice...


A
⇧ Zoom to top

Help-QA supports basic Markdown, emoji ๐Ÿ˜, and tagging friends with @username!