I don't know. I do not have proof the 5G is definitely not harmful at all and said as much. But I doubt it is because there isn't evidence to support that idea.

Maybe we should ask someone who works on putting up the towers and see what they say.

I am glad she has helped you and others with your condition. I will take your word that she is a very good person and has done a lot of public good.

Either way, the stuff she said about EHS seems fishy to me for the reasons I said.

We all do make mistakes and I understand that, and if I was capable of saying what I said in a way that wasn't offensive I would have but I don't know how to when it comes to this. People are dying everyday by the hundreds. I am less concerned with other people's feelings when it comes to false information about COVID 19.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. No one is entitled to their own facts.

I am paraphrasing but you said something to the effect that you do not trust Bill Gates and think maybe he shouldn't be involved with vaccines or whatever.

Okay. That is fine. The stuff you wrote yourself is an opinion and you presented it as such, for the most part. I do not judge you for that. Feel free to express your opinion.

Again, even if your opinion is "I think COVID is perfectly safe and not killing anyone and this is all a waste." Again, fine, your opinion. I will vehemently disagree because all the facts say otherwise, but you are allowed to express it.

What I DO judge is sharing a video that presents opinion as fact and intentionally misrepresents facts in order to increase their account's visibility or push a political agenda.

That is what this video was doing. You do not have a right to pretend you are a doctor and share false information about an illness that is killing people. You do not get to be self-righteous about lying to people and claim "well, I have free speech!" That is wrong.

Your health is not your choice, but sharing information that you did not know whether or not it was true was a choice.

I said "should" and I mean it. The video is not about evolution or what shape the earth is. I'm sorry if it came off offensive. You do not have to listen to me, do whatever you want.

"if u don't want to do something"

You missed the part where I said I did want to do it.

The article doesn't mention scientific studies. The author says "I've met a lot of people with EHS, so it must be real." Ok, fair enough, but that is only anecdotal evidence. "EMR is known to cause cancer." Not all EMR, only ionizing EMR, which are not the kind emitted by electrical devices.

That fallacy, coupled with the fact that there is a link to a supplement store on the site, makes me narrow my eyes and not want to trust that site.

https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/...

That is a link for the who, I have a feeling you won't trust them, fair enough.

Edit: I read too fast sometimes, there is a study mention in the myhill page, but it's doesn't seem to be directly about EHS, more about biological effects of EMF exposure, and even seems to talk about therapeutic uses of EMFs.

I've always thought that if I get a tattoo I will get some phrase or something in Ancient Greek. That'd be neat.

I don't think I want a tattoo though. It's just a fun thought.

Sorry if that comes off as aggressive or harsh but this is a topic I'm a little hot-headed about.

You make very long comments Jetmoo, which is fine, but also makes it impossible for me to respond to everything.

Responding to because I actually have a fatty liver so I've been prescribed a low fat diet. So something I think about a lot.

Animal fat specifically, or all fat?

The problem with animal fat is it's often "bad fat" that your body is inefficient at breaking down and tends to get stuck in your system, and collect in places...like my liver. Most plant fat isn't great for you either. Animal fats are worse because they also have a high cholesterol content and that gets stuck in your arteries, gums them up, and makes it more likely for you to have a heart attack or stroke.

Omega 3s are good fats that are easier for your body to break down and studies suggest hey can actually help clear out the bad fat and cholesterol in your system. They can be found in both animal and plant fat forms, but the animal fat version is actually better for you because it is easier for your body to break it down into a usable form. However, it turns out plant algae also has that kind of fat...maybe it's something about the sea, who knows. In any case I have a plant algae version since I am a vegetarian.

I was already a vegetarian when I found out about my fatty liver so I wasn't getting animal fat from meat...but I love cheese and I was eating cheese daily and often more than once a day. So I high on animal fat and cholesterol.

So, on my dr's advice I cut out the cheese (I still eating a couple of times a week, but a lot less) and I lost 15 lbs in a couple of month and felt physically much better too.

To respond the stuff that's actually about 5G: My understanding, based on my professional google research (I'm being facetious) is that the type of radiation emitted by cell phone towers is non-ionizing and does not directly damage cells or mutate DNA. And studies that have shown there to be an increase in tumors in rats exposed to EMF, the different between control groups and experimental groups is so small that the difference could just as well be chance...also from the three studies I looked at that you studied...I mean, they were really trying to fry those poor rats, weren't they? I feel bad for the poor guys.

On the other stuff...a lot of what you are saying is really anecdotal and hasn't been seriously studied and could just as easily be coincidence. Why is one kid suffering but not the others? And other questions I could ask but I would be here all day.

The other stuff about ME I REALLY know nothing about and won't waste your time by trying to speak to it. And besides, it's not what the topic is about. I understand you are trying to say that some dr's are corrupt or perhaps just bad drs, but that's something I already know, believe me. And I believe you when you say you have been treated badly, and I am sorry to hear.

I have no idea, there are a lot of links there.

I don't really get the aluminium foil thing. Is that like, a reference to something? I used to make men out of aluminum foil that my mom wrapped my pb and j sandwich in when I was in school. Is that what you are referencing? How did you know that? Are you in the NSA? Is your last name Rockefeller?

In all seriousness, I appreciate you at least looking at the evidence I presented. Even as I am confused as to why you aren't able to see what it is saying. In any case, it led to a more interesting comment to read than the part where you started talking about Rothschilds as if that had anything to do with what I was saying.

There is one part that was most interesting to ME because I am actually legitimately confused about it. I am seeing conflicting sources on it.

Namely, I see sources that do claim that the CDC (who owns the patent in question) routinely patent naturally occurring viruses in order to prevent private companies from doing so, to prevent those companies from holding research on it hostage.

But I also see lots of source that say that, as you say, you cannot patent a discovery.

And yet AGAIN, I see sources that say patenting naturally occurring viruses and their genetic code is a legal gray area and that there was actually a supreme court case about in 2013.

Obviously I would need to do more research to figure out the truth but I've also reached my limit on this topic for now.